In Re: Terry C. III, Maliyah T., Sameer T., Majai W., and Mica W.

CINA: Change in permanency plan: Concurrent plans

CSA No. 0853, Sept. Term 2013. Unreported. Opinion by Nazarian, J. Filed Jan. 30, 2014.

In adding a concurrent permanency plan of guardianship with a relative, the court did not treat the best interest of the children in boilerplate fashion, as their mother alleged; nor did it deny her the right to more time to achieve reunification, as the court ordered DSS to pursue both plans concurrently.

Read the opinion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*