CINA: Permanency plan: Intervening TPR
In Re: Jayme K., Kayven K., and Keira K.
CSA No. 1899, Sept. Term 2013. Unreported.
Opinion by Leahy, J. Filed: July 11, 2014.
Appeal from Cecil County. Dismissed.
RecordFax #14-0711-09, 10 pages.
The parents’ challenge to modification of the CINAs’ permanency plans was rendered moot when the father gave conditional consent, and the mother was deemed to have consented, to the termination of their parental rights.
Maryland Family Law Maryland family law opinions and commentary
