Sign In
Upcoming Event
Free Newsletter
FLAUBERT MBONGO v. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL
FLAUBERT MBONGO v. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL
Listen to this articleCivil litigation — Legal justification — Material facts in dispute
Flaubert Mbongo, appellant, filed a five-count complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against Bombardier Transportation Services USA Corporation (BTS) and three of its employees: E.W. Smith, Leonard Sullivan, and Christopher Difatta (collectively, the appellees). The gist of appellant’s complaint was that he had been wrongfully removed and banned from riding the MARC train. Appellees prevailed on their motion for summary judgment in which they argued that they were legally justified in removing and banning appellant from the train because he had been disorderly.
Appellant essentially raises one question on appeal: Did the circuit court err in granting summary judgment because there were material issues of fact in dispute?
