Appellate Court of Maryland: VEQ clause, unreasonable risk of harm, redevelopment
VEQ clause — unreasonable risk of harm — redevelopment
Supreme Court of Maryland: Search and seizure
Reasonable suspicion to believe that a person is carrying a gun, by itself, no longer justifies a Terry stop.
S.C. v. State of Maryland
Criminal Law—Possession of Weapon—J.I.T. Evidence is sufficient to sustain Appellant’s conviction for possession of a weapon in a place of confinement.
Turkish-American Community Center, Inc. v. B.B.C., LLC
Contracts—Breach of Contract—Statute of L.T. Circuit court did not commit reversible error when it denied TACC’s motion for summary judgment regarding B.B. counterclaim, which was found to be within the applicable statute of limitations.
In the Matter of J.H. v. Washington County Board of County Commissioners
Administrative Law—P.I.A.—D.D.T. Circuit court ruled in favor of the County, affirming that the delay in document production did not warrant statutory damages under the Maryland Public Information Act.
M.A.A. v. State of Maryland
Criminal Law—Right to Counsel—Discharge of A.T. Trial court did not comply with the requirements of Maryland Rule 4-215 after Aguirre requested to discharge his attorney, necessitating reversal and remand for a new trial.
M.M.F. v. State of Maryland
Criminal Law—P.W.—C.R.T. Court affirmed the denial of Ford's requests for a continuance and to discharge counsel, finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's rulings.
In the Matter of the Irmgard H. Hawkins By-Pass Trust v. Prince George’s County District Council
A.L.—Z.O.—Footnote Exceptions The District Council's disapproval of T.D.S.P. was affirmed, as the footnote exception relied upon was not applicable under the new zoning ordinance.
4th Circuit: First Amendment, statute of limitations, hearsay
First Amendment — statute of limitations — hearsay
Supreme Court of Maryland: Fourth Amendment, reasonable suspicion
Fourth Amendment — reasonable suspicion
D.N.M. v. State of Maryland
Criminal Law—Evidence—S.T. Trial court erred in admitting a Snapchat message sent by the appellant the day before the shooting, as it lacked relevance and was highly prejudicial to his self-defense claim.
W.R. v. State of Maryland
Criminal Law—Assault—S.T. Trial court found that Richardson was a mutual aggressor in a gunfight and that imperfect self-defense did not apply to his conviction for first-degree assault.









