ANTONIO HUNTER v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Unreported Opinions//January 24, 2022//
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Statement to police
We are asked to determine whether Antonio Hunter, Appellant, clearly invoked his rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, prior to the time he provided a statement to the police, without an attorney present, within the dictates of
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
Related Content
Editors Picks
MD public defender’s office didn’t comply with $623K youth justice g[...]
27/8/2026
AI benefits, pitfalls in legal industry discussed in Daily Record webinar
27/8/2026
MDTA names new chief of police
27/8/2026
How are MD attorneys using AI in practices?
27/8/2026
Key Bridge collapse: Most claims by Baltimore City, County dismissed
26/8/2026
More News
Trump administration’s pay cuts for migrant farmworkers ruled illegal
27/8/2026
Court approves Bank of America’s $72.5M settlement with Epstein accusers
27/8/2026
Judge dismisses lawsuit by Elon Musk’s X challenging NY hate speech law
27/8/2026
Inflation remains sticky in July; Q2 GDP growth unrevised at 1.5%
26/8/2026
Lawyers gear up as Trump administration threatens election officials with arrest
26/8/2026





