Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

JONATHAN PHIFER v. STATE OF MARYLAND

JONATHAN PHIFER v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Listen to this article

Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Cell phone photograph

A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Jonathan Phifer, appellant, of first-degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, possession of a firearm by a disqualified person, and wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun.

Mr. Phifer raises three arguments on appeal, which we have slightly rephrased for clarity: I. Did the trial court err when it precluded defense counsel from questioning a “State’s witness about whether he hoped for or expected a benefit in exchange for information he provided to the police”? II. Did the trial court err when it admitted into evidence a certain photograph on Mr. Phifer’s cell phone? III. Did the trial court err when it denied Mr. Phifer’s motion to limit the testimony of the State’s firearms expert?

Read the opinion