
The article advances a dangerous narrative that contains an implicit bias that all working lawyer parents have to fight against every single day. It’s that if we have children, our lawyering will suffer because of it. Apparently we have only X amount of interest and energy to go around, and our children suck up a good portion of it, leaving less for our clients and colleagues.
This article made me reflect on whether being a parent has impacted my lawyering. For me, I say yes and no. I think the answer is different for every parent and part of the danger of the article is painting huge categories of people with a broad brush. I’m only speaking about myself. Here are my conclusions:
Being a mother did not make my work product better. I did not improve my motion writing. It did not improve my trial skills or affect the hard skills that we use every day. That would be nice, but no such luck. This article did make me realize that we have not come as far as we thought, that internalized misogyny is real, and that each of us needs to be mindful of the implicit biases we have against working parents with whom we work every day.