D.S. v. State of Maryland
Unreported Opinions//July 7, 2026//
Criminal Law—Sufficiency of Evidence—Identification
The evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support D.S.’s convictions for first-degree assault, use of a handgun in a felony, reckless endangerment, and discharging a firearm in Baltimore City.
Related Content
Editors Picks
Glen Burnie ICE shooting victim’s injuries not being treated, lawyers say
8/7/2026
10 highest-paid lobbyists of 2026 MD General Assembly session — and who they w[...]
8/7/2026
4 new judges appointed by MD Gov. Wes Moore
8/7/2026
Kids injured by state have until they turn 21 to sue, MD appellate court rules
8/7/2026
Chasen bankruptcy: Baltimore developer grilled by lawyers on business associates
7/7/2026
More News
Judge rules for The Washington Post in $3.8B defamation suit from Trump Media
8/7/2026
Former Wisconsin judge sentenced in Trump immigration case
8/7/2026
Trump administration puts plan for Harriet Tubman $20 bill on ice
8/7/2026
Deere settles lawsuit by FTC, states over equipment repair restrictions
8/7/2026
DC Metro’s Red Line commuters face a summer slog amid station shutdowns
8/7/2026




