ANDRE HAMLIN v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Daily Record Staff//November 19, 2020//
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Marijuana possession
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Andre Hamlin, appellant, was convicted of unlawful possession of a regulated firearm; unlawful possession of ammunition; and transporting a handgun in his vehicle. On appeal, he contends that the court erred in allowing the State to present evidence that he possessed marijuana at the time of his arrest because, he claims, that evidence was irrelevant and unduly prejudicial.
Related Content
Editors Picks
Baltimore’s Ekiben sued over copyright to ‘Space Jam’ theme
24/7/2026
Baltimore double homicide conviction upheld by MD Supreme Court
24/7/2026
For some families, the answer to the housing crisis is in backyard
24/7/2026
Man detained by ICE outside Baltimore school must be released, judge says
23/7/2026
MD employees union files labor charge against USM, Moore administration over rai[...]
23/7/2026
More News
Chocolate maker Lindt misleads consumers about child labor, lawsuit claims
23/7/2026
Prosecutors to drop New York Times subpoenas over Trump plane reporting
23/7/2026
Minnesota man gets life in prison for assassinating Democratic lawmaker
23/7/2026
States sue Trump administration for conditioning disaster funds on election chan[...]
23/7/2026
Trump’s consumer finance watchdog pick pledges ‘open mind’ on [...]
23/7/2026




